Facing Global War with Bilateralism
13 April, 2025
Deepak Razdan
As the New World continued to
churn after US President Donald Trump’s unilateral announcement of stiff import
tariffs, his subsequent pauses and a steep penalty for China’s reciprocal
tariffs, it was almost clear the US President was articulating for his country virtually
the same pain and suffering that Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelenskyy was
speaking about for his nation.
The Ukraine President was seeking
world attention to his country’s plight after Russia brutally captured parts of
its eastern territory, bombed its urban infrastructure and buildings, and
caused loss of innocent lives.
President Trump has similarly sought
the world’s recognition that China has captured vast parts of its market,
taking advantage of its low tariffs and inability to act against theft of
intellectual property. The world made huge trade profits while the US kept
quiet, respecting multilateral laws and conventions, he said.
If Ukraine lost territory and
suffered bloodshed on its border under Russian attacks, Mr Trump is pointing
out that China, as well as many other small and developed economies, had
drained the US of vital economic blood, without even making a whimper, in the
name of free trade. Certainly, the US could not let things go on like this.
Disclosing how China was earning
billions of US dollars in its trade with the US, and made use of the money to
build a stronger army, Mr Trump said the low US tariffs had brought the country
to such a bad shape that it can’t even make sufficient antibiotics for its
sick.
The US was importing all of its
computers, phones, televisions and electronics. A single shipyard in China
produced more ships every year than all the shipyards in the US combined, he
said. Announcing his government’s intent to fight back, he said, “We are going
to build all of them.”
Mr Trump said the tariffs were
needed to rectify the situation and to stop the nation moving towards a
“collapse.” He argued that “we can’t be kind when we are cheated.” The tariffs
could have been higher, he said, if he had only matched the high tariffs which most
countries imposed on the US goods, but he restrained himself, as that would
have made things difficult for some people.
Mr Zelenskyy’s plea for support
has been answered by the United Kingdom-led Coalition of the Willing comprising
the European Union nations including Germany and France, pledging substantial
financial help to rebuild Ukraine’s defence systems.
Mr Trump’s determination to
continue the tariffs has evoked response from over 75 nations wanting to sort
out the issue and offering to substantially lower their tariffs for US goods. This
great churn in international relations has a few lessons for India.
As nations across the globe searched
for solutions, there were suggestions for trade groupings away from the US.
There was widespread caution and anger on how to respond to the “illogical” US
tariffs. China went solo and matched 34 per cent against it with its 34 per
cent against the US, which quickly raised it by another 50 per cent.
As the numbers game caught up,
the US settled at 145 per cent against 125 per cent of the Chinese. This made
the plot clear. It is US versus China. The US President put on pause the
additional slabs of tariffs for the whole world for 90 days, leaving out China
and a few other nations like Canada which had announced their reciprocal
tariffs for the US.
On 12th April, the US has
withdrawn its reciprocal tariffs on a large range of electronic goods like smartphones,
laptops, computer processors, chips, semiconductor devices, hard drives and
some other electronic items.
The European Union Trade
Ministers had also approved EU’s 25 per cent against the US, but withheld the
announcement in response to the pause declared by Mr Trump. French President
Emmanuel Macron remarked the pause was not meaningful as 25 per cent tariff on
steel, aluminium and autos continued along with the base 10 per cent tariff.
The White House explained the
pause was necessary as more than 75 countries had approached the US
administration for talks and to settle the issue. The US had received
indications that most countries wanted to substantially reduce their levies
against the US goods.
Adjusting to the New World realities,
India has to realize that globalization is good, but one must not stop looking
inwards and around the neighbourhood. India has a large domestic economy which can
keep the wheels of production and consumption going. Globalisation brings
advantages of cheaper and quality goods delivered at your ports by countries
which have mastered the innovations.
The only worry here is that
there should be no disruption in supply chains. Globalisation brings addictive
interdependence. People to people contacts grow stronger, until there is entry
of politics.
India will realize that it will
be better to diversify the direction of its trade. Every small country matters
as much as a developed nation. The value of bilateral trade agreements was not
underestimated even at the peak of multilateralism, but when WTO is forgotten
and multi-nation organisations built decades earlier are being rejected, the
free trade agreements (FTAs) and bilateral trade agreements (BTAs) become
essential.
The Indian
government has been working on Trade Agreements which are helpful during
uncertain conditions in global economic engagement.
Currently,
India is engaged in three particularly important negotiations -- Free Trade
Agreements (FTAs) with the European Union and the United Kingdom and a
Bilateral Trade Agreement (BTA) with the United States. India’s BAT with the US
is in advanced stage of talks and efforts are that its first tranche be
announced by the coming fall.
Commerce
and Industry Minister Piyush Goyal assured exporters recently that the Indian
team for talks with the US is exploring the right mix and the right balance.
There will be speed but not undue haste to ensure the right outcome for the
country. Negotiations have been launched with New Zealand also for a free trade
agreement.
Mr
Goyal said the current situation was difficult, but it offered some
opportunities also to India. There is a potential for increase in
manufacturing, creation of additional jobs, as India can attract big players in
global supply chain. India has established itself as a trusted and reliable
partner and a predictable business-friendly destination.
The Commerce and Industry
Minister complimented Indian exporters and industry for achieving India’s highest
ever exports of above US dollars 820 billion during 2024-25.
This showed a six per cent growth over the previous fiscal year, in spite of multiple headwinds including the Red Sea crisis, Israel-Hamas conflict spilling over to Gulf region, the Russia-Ukraine conflict and slow growth in some developed economies. Trade with new partners will give hope to all sections of the Indian society, despite a difficult world environment.
Comments
Post a Comment